I love a good musical. It can be live or on TV and I will sit down and usually watch it. Especially when it is well written, well acted, and the music is actually something that I would listen even if it were not part of the movie. Across The Universe is a great example of this. Heck, Once More With Feeling (from Buffy The Vampire Slayer) is STILL on my iPod to this day. So to find something that not only works musically but also visually is a rare treat...and this movie works on all levels.
Storyline: A (unnamed) Guy is a Dublin guitarist/singer-songwriter who makes a living by fixing vacuum cleaners in his Dad's Hoover repair shop by day, and singing and playing for money on the Dublin streets by night. A (unnamed) Girl is a Czech who plays piano when she gets a chance, and does odd jobs by day and takes care of her mom and her daughter by night. Guy meets Girl, and they get to know each other as the Girl helps the Guy to put together a demo disc that he can take to London in hope of landing a music contract. During the same several day period, the Guy and the Girl work through their past loves, and reveal their budding love for one another, through their songs. - Written by IMDB.com
This movie turned out to be an absolutely fantastic film. The music was great! I loved that
there are no names mentioned from the stars and that the man and woman in the movie
aren't even "real" actors...they are musicians. So the music never feels overproduced or like
they are singing along with a CD it just sounds like we are watching the meeting of two very
talented musicians that are also trying to navigate through their personal lives. Just a great
little movie.
Thoughts? It's a movie that you can't go wrong with. The only draw backs are the accents
are a liiiiiiittle hard to understand from time to time AND there is a bit of a "downer" that is
associated with the film that I really wasn't expecting but I actually prefered it to the idea
than everything would completely work out for everyone involved.
All in all, a great movie and a great soundtrack!
Friday, November 30, 2012
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
(Movie Review) Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 2
Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 2 is proof that bad acting, bad
effects, and lying to your audience will make your franchise a success…as long
as the cast is pretty enough.
It has never been a secret that I am not a fan of the
Twilight film franchise. Most fans will protest that statement with “you should
read the books” or “you just don’t get it”. They are correct. I haven’t read
the books and I don’t get it. Because last night I was robbed. Not only of my
ticket price but also of the experience of actually getting on board with this
last installment. More specifically, I was sold a bill of goods that this movie
yanked out from under me. For that, I plan to crush them.
Storyline: Newly turned Vampire Bella (Stewart) and Edward
(Pattinson) are elated at the birth of their newborn daughter Renesmee. But
when Renesmee proves to be special and her age increases at an alarmingly rapid
rate the family begins to worry. Word soon makes its way back to the Volturi
and they, worried that this child could expose Vampires or that she may
challenge their power one day, decides to confront the Cullen Clan and take her
by force.
Worth the admission? No. That’s all I can say.
SPOILERS: Below is some of my "beef" with the movie.
So you read this review and probably think that I am an overly cynical person, but I wanted to tell you where I was coming from.
I have hated these movie. Truly hated them. Even this movie was a lame duck for the majority of the film. Nothing really happened. It was just a bunch of waiting to see when the Volturi would show up. All we did was see Renesmee grow up a bit (and that CGI was trash. A CGI baby and the way they CGIed the kids face while she was growing up?) and watch the Cullens meet people. That was pretty much it. Then came the one thing that actually changed my opinion. The battle. Seeing Carlisle beheaded made it all very "real" and for the first time in the franchise I thought "oh hell. These folks CAN actually die". And die they did. You have a few fan favorites that are dropping like flies. Carlisle and Jasper specifically. Then the tides shift and the Volturi start getting wasted. Marcus and Alec were awesome to see. The look of fear on Jane's face after Alec is taken out and how she gets taken out was awesome. Then Aro, dear Aro, lost his head and got fire put to him. But wait...not really.
That is where I honestly could have thrown my damn drink at the screen. I came into this movie as a "hater" but by the end of it I was really starting to enjoy myself. Then I find out none of it happened? No one died. No one fought. Technically, if im not mistaken, there was only one death in this movie and that was Irina (Maggie Grace). The reason that it ticks me off so bad is because my whole problem with this movie franchise is that everyone is always safe. No one dies. You might think they are going to but no one ever does. The bad guys, sure, but no one else. And as a person that never read the books I thought that this movie had finally stepped up to the plate and was going to raise the stakes a bit.
To me, it comes off as cheap. Having your audience go through all of the emotional stuff with the loss of characters and the satisfaction of watching the remaining characters defeat the bad guys and then, just so you wont make any of the fans mad, you wipe the slate clean and say "just kidding. Nobody died. Yaaaaaay!". The ultimate case of getting your cake and eating it too.
My second big complaint is the fact that the movie
borderline supports/glorifies a pedopheliac relationship. Jacob and Renesmee is
not something that they should have really gone into much detail on. And I will
give them credit for avoiding it for the most part. But his being overly
protective of her and then the joke of "so can I date your daughter"
was in really poor taste and really creepy.
So, that it my gripe.
(Movie Review) SKYFALL (2012)
I was never really that big of a James Bond fan as a kid. I,
as you all probably know by now, was much more interested in Superheroes and
things of that nature. Some blowhard, alcoholic, womanizing and fictional
superspy was never going to steal that attention away from DC comics. When I
was a teen I remember looking into the origin of Bond and finding that Bond’s
creator, Ian Fleming, actually took the attributes and skills of this
protagonist from a hand full of soldiers that he knew during his time with the
Naval Intelligence Division during WWII. For some reason knowing that these
skills came from real people suddenly changed the character for me and I really
began to appreciate the franchise. This was right around the time that
GoldenEye came out (1995) and Pierce Brosnan played the title character. Since
then I have watched most of the films from the franchise. The good and the
really bad. As far as SKYFALL, I think that it deserves a place near the top of
the list.
Storyline: After a mission goes bad Bond (Craig) disappears
from the world of espionage with what appears to be no plans of coming back.
But when MI6 is attacked, and a former operative named Raoul Silva (Bardem) is
found to be responsible, Bond resurfaces to help take him down. Silva is determined
to take down MI6 and “M” (Dench) for ruining his life…and only James Bond
stands in his way.
Sam Mendes really knows how to make a movie look good. There
are a few scenes in this movie that are not only breathtaking but rival any
past films in the franchise. Iconic shots with brilliant background colors and
vibrant scenery make this my favorite bond movie (visually). The negatives of
the movie are few and far between. At 143 minutes the movie is a bit long, but
I really can’t think of a scene that should have been cut to shave time off. It
may not be the greatest Bond film, but it is a very solid one.
Friday, November 9, 2012
(Movie Review) Wreck-It Ralph (2012)
I remember when I got my first console gaming system. It was
a Coleco Vision and it allowed me to play “state of the art” games like Donkey
Kong, Mouse Trap, and I believe that there was an E.T. game in there too. Then
we moved on to Atari, Nintendo, Sega Genesis, Super Nintendo, etc. My Saturday
mornings were always filled with equal parts video games and cartoons. So when
I first heard of Wreck-It Ralph being in the works I was really excited to see
it. Sometimes a movie just hits you right and the idea of it just “works”, and
apparently the idea hit everyone right…because it now sits as Walt Disney’s
Animation Studios largest debuting movie ever.
Storyline: Wreck-It Ralph (Reilly) is tired of being the
“bad guy”. He is an underappreciated character in an arcade game called Fix-It
Felix, Jr. While the rest of the people in his game love Felix (McBrayer) they
treat Ralph like a villain and it soon begins to hurt Ralph’s feelings. On the
30th anniversary of their video game Ralph returns to find that the
characters in his game are having a celebration and did not invite him. When he
casually invites himself in, and then wrecks the party, the people make a point
to tell him that he will never be a winner like Felix. So Ralph goes on a
mission to prove them wrong. He leaves his video game and begins to game hop in
the hopes of winning a gold medal to bring back to the people in his game and
to prove that he can be a hero too.
I absolutely loved this movie. I giggled during the whole
thing. It’s bright, really well made, funny, and the voice acting is perfect.
For the first time in my life I can say that I loved something that Sarah
Silverman (voice of Vanellope von Schweetz) has been in. Her character was
beyond cute and really helped make the movie what it was.
One other thing that I loved was the inclusion of so many
characters from past popular video games. Street Fighter, Super Mario Bros.,
Pac Man, Sonic the Hedgehog, Frogger, Mortal Kombat, and Q*bert all are
represented at some point in this movie. I just thought that it was a really
nice touch and that it gave the movie a Who
Framed Roger Rabbit quality that I really was not expecting.
Worth the admission? Without a doubt! This movie hits the
spot, especially after the last few weeks of sitting through disappointing
films at the theater. It’s a very touching and well-made movie. Kudos to
Disney’s Animation Studio. They have consistently put out film after film of
the most imaginative animated movies in history. This movie, in my humble
opinion, is the best one yet. Make sure to go see it!
Friday, November 2, 2012
(Movie Review) Silent Hill 2 (2012)
Silent Hill: Revelation tops my list as the worst movie of
2012
It’s getting a little colder outside and one of the best
things for me to combat the chilly weather is Hot Chocolate. I love a good cup
when it starts getting cold out. There is something so simple and comforting
about it. So one day, a few years back, I was in New York for work on one of
the coldest days of the year and decided that a nice cup of coco would hit the
spot just right. I placed my order, waited, and was finally given this overly complicated
monstrosity of a drink. It didn’t even have a top on it because it was so full.
It had whipped cream, sprinkles, some kind of glaze and was topped with a
cherry. After digging through the mess for a while, trying to just get a sip of
coco, I finally threw it away because it just wasn’t worth the hassle. I can’t
think of a better comparison for this movie. It took something that was simple
and unique with Silent Hill (2006) and destroyed it with a contrived story, bad
acting and poor effects...and a cherry on top.
Storyline: What do you do when you can’t trust the world
around you? That is a question that is plaguing Heather Mason (Clemens). Her
vivid dreams of a place called Silent Hill and the horrific monsters that she
sees when alone make her question everything about her life. When her father
(Bean) is taken in the night, and a strange message is left that tells her to
go back to Silent Hill, she embarks on a journey to save him. But when she
arrives at the town she is quickly confronted with the truth of who she really
is and how she is connected with the town of Silent Hill.
What is going on with “scary movies” this year? Between this
and Paranormal Activity 4 I actually
had pretty high hopes for a few good Halloween scares. They just keep getting
it wrong this year, and this movie is the worst offender.
Worth the admission? I wouldn’t even recommend renting this
from RedBox when it comes out. This movie is HORRIBLE. They couldn’t have
gotten this movie more wrong. The first movie was actually really good
(considering what I was expecting) and the story could have continued on from
that very easily, but this movie takes a hard left turn and crashes into the
trees. Don’t even get me started on the acting. Redwoods are less wooden than
the acting in this movie. I, honestly, made jokes during the whole thing
because I was so bored. And no, me talking in the theater didn’t offend the
other three people that came out to watch this horrible movie on its opening
night. Please skip it. I hear that Sinister
is a solid scary movie, so I would recommend you get your Halloween frights
from it.
(Movie Review) Paranormal Activity 4 (2012)
The only thing scary about Paranormal Activity 4 is the
horrible story and lukewarm box office reception
The horror genre is full of classics. Think about how many
of your favorite 80’s movies are now classic horror films/franchises. The 90’s
turned out a good horror franchise or two (Scream,
I Know What You Did Last Summer, etc.) that still maintained the spirit of
the more classic horror franchises. They weren’t just gore and graphic sex.
They were suspenseful. Unfortunately the 2000’s decided to take the horror
genre and spin it into a gore fest that is lovingly called “Torture Porn”.
Movies like Hostel, The Human Centipede,
the Halloween remakes and, of course,
the SAW franchise took all of the fun
out of horror. Theaters were reduced large audiences of people watching the
movies with their hands over their faces peaking between their fingers at the
carnage on the screen. Movies like that defined how an entire generation
perceived horror...and people like me felt sorry for those that missed out of
classic suspenseful horror movies.
In October of 2009 I saw a glimpse of hope for this genre in
the form of a little independent (and very cheaply made) suspenseful horror
movie called Paranormal Activity. It
finally seemed that film makers were steering away from the gory films and
would start making movies that actually scared people instead of just making
movies that grossed people out. The film was a HUGE success and garnered a
sequel, which I think not only stands eye level with the original, but actually
strengthens the story of the original. Then the obvious happened. They got
greedy and tried to tie in a prequel as a third installment. Not a great idea.
It made the franchise look weak and like it was grasping at straws for a story.
As if that were not bad enough, they pushed forward with a complete train wreck
of a fourth installment that not only diluted the entire series, but has the
worst story and the worst “twists” of the entire franchise. Sometimes you
should just quit while you are ahead.
Storyline: It’s been five years since Katie and Hunter have
disappeared into the night after the events that took place on October 8th
and 9th of 2006. But when a mysterious woman and a small child move
in next door to the Nelson family, things began to happen. The woman claims to
be ill and in need of someone to take care of her son while she is in the
hospital and the Nelson’s agree to allow the young boy to stay with them. Fatal
events that can’t be explained soon begin taking place.
Worth the admission? I’m going to say no, but that isn’t
going to stop you from seeing it. It’s Halloween and you want a good scare, but
trust me, you will not get it from this movie. It’s REALLY not up to snuff with
the first two films and is obviously reaching for stories…even stories that
aren’t worth reaching for. A boring and pointless addition to the franchise.
(Movie Review) Taken 2 (2012)
Taken 2 defeats the box office but kills the audience with
boredom in the process
There was something special about Taken (2008). Maybe it was
that it crept up on everyone. Kind of how Liam Neeson would creep up on his
victims and take them down with a swift punch to the throat or a broken neck.
It wasn’t something that people were expecting to do as well as it did. What
made it a winner was positive word of mouth from everyone that happened to go
in to see it. It was a lower budget film
with lots of action and the introduction of Liam Neeson as a legitimate action
star. So what do you think that the logical thing to do next would be? If you
guessed RUIN IT with a mediocre sequel you would be absolutely correct.
Storyline: Life is going much better for Bryan Mills
(Neeson) these days. He is finally a functioning part of his daughters life, he
and his ex-wife are more than friendly to each other, and he is enjoying
retirement (with the exception of the occasional contract job). His family life
is good. However, the family life of Murad Krasniqi (Serbedzija) is not so
great. He was the father, uncle, brother and friend to many of those that were
killed when Mills rescued his daughter Kim (Grace) from those that once
abducted her….and Krasniqi is out for revenge. While on a family trip to
Istanbul, Byran and his ex-wife Lenore (Janssen) are abducted and it is up to
Kim to help free them. The entire family is at risk and it will take all of
their efforts to get them safely out of Istanbul.
As you can see from the above film description the work load
is somewhat shared in this movie. When the first movie came out, and it was
about a father that would move Heaven and Earth to get his daughter back, it
was very focused on one man and his mission. A tone was set. But this move
bounces back and forth from Neeson and Grace pursuing the bad guys. So the way
that one character approaches the situation, like an ex-government operative
that isn’t scared of anything, is often interrupted by the actions of how a
different character approaches the situation, like a scared teenage girl that
has never been forced into a situation like this. It makes for a very uneven
movie. The flow of it never seems to really live up to the first film.
Worth the admission? I am going to have to say
no. I hate to do it. I loved the first movie and love Liam Neeson, but this
movie just doesn’t come close to the original. The fights are REALLY choppy and
the action is pretty tame. The two big “kills” in the movie are huge letdowns.
It just came across as lazy and, I hate to say it, boring. Wait until it hits
DVD or Netflix to watch it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






